What Went Wrong (and Right) When 47 Plants Deployed Collaborative Robots: The ROI Math Nobody Talks About
Most cobot deployments hit 60-70% of promised throughput gains in year one. We tracked 47 installations across metalworking, assembly, and packaging to find out why, and what separates the 8 that actually beat projections.
I spent three weeks in May visiting plants that had deployed collaborative robots in the past 18 months. I went to see the wins, but mostly I wanted to find the installations where the numbers didn't work. The plants where the six-figure investment sat idle by 3 p.m. on a Thursday, or where the promised 40% cycle time reduction never materialized. What I found was not a failure of the hardware. It was a failure of operational planning, and the failure looked almost identical across every site where ROI underperformed.
This is a VIP article
Unlock exclusive analysis, daily briefings, and ad-free reading.
Unlock VIP - $8.88/moWant more like this?
Get industrial AI intelligence delivered to your inbox every week — free.
Subscribe FreeRelated Articles
23,000 Cobots on Plant Floors: Where the Deployment Actually Works (and Where It Doesn't)
Collaborative robots are no longer the future. They're running on 23,000 shop floors across North America right now. Here's what's...
62,000 AGVs and AMRs Deployed in North America: What Your Fleet Needs to Know About Density, ROI, and the Maintenance Reality
North American manufacturers and 3PLs deployed 62,000 autonomous mobile robots through mid-2026. Payback periods have collapsed to 18-24 months. But...
Digital Twins Hit the Fab Floor. Here's What Actually Works and What Doesn't.
Fabrication shops running synchronized virtual replicas of their production lines are cutting changeover time by 35 percent and catching catastrophic...
The 4.1 Briefing
Industrial AI intelligence, distilled weekly for operators and decision-makers.
